Hi, thanks for adding detail here, but you seem to have added several duplicate phone numbers that were already mapped using the contact: scheme
e.g. node/10553314712
way/266493096
etc.
Try to check for this, because there could be other places where conflicting data is added

Thank you for the feedback.

I feel like this sort of topic has been discussed many times before, of whether to have many individual changesets or fewer but limited in scope. My conclusion is that there are various suitable tools to analyse history which allow filtering by where edits are being made, by user and more and so having fewer changesets makes analysis of these bot edits easier.

The plan to have a maximum of one changeset per state per day was in the discussed proposal and no objections to that aspect were raised at the time. If you think there is something to add or a discussion to be had then please comment on the proposal thread or create a new topic in the forum.

I don't quite know what you mean there.

This edit only changed the phone value of node/3442248118 and did not change any other tags nor revert the phone tag to its previous value.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/3442248118

Hi, thanks for updating these.
Should these two identical schools be merged into one object? From aerial imagery they appear to be separate, but perhaps your local knowledge can assist here?
way/1296800407
way/1296800406

PS, I removed the building tag from them as the whole site is not a building

I'm not quite sure which of the nodes edited here you are talking about, but it wasn't the bot that made it look like a regular business, but rather the original edit would have done that.

Tricky one.

I think we can be confident there is no 13, due to the other UPRNs being consecutive from 1 to 15.

In the council tax data, 15 and 16 have the same UPRN, so there's some error there.

There is only 54, 56 and 58 around here, although there have been known to be houses missing from the data.

I'll put a note here to be surveyed

Hi, thanks for adding Montreal Crepes et Dumplings Chinois
Do you want to double check the phone number though, it doesn't seem to have the right number of digits.
node/13537140449

The check data was based on the government data confirming that it exists rather than a site visit, in this instance

Was this comment meant to go on the note here?
I am not in the area to survey this

This is still marked as a tobacco shop, did you mean to change the category as well?

Hi, see note/5079443 are you sure this bridge exists?

Hi, thanks for adding extra details to Our Lady's Primary.

You accidentally set the whole area as a building, I've reverted that now.

Also, we prefer to map phone numbers in international format, but they get automatically fixed by a bot that I run.

And I don't know why you removed capacity, that is the legal capacity of the school, as per DfE: https://www.get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/Establishments/Establishment/Details/135246
This is commonly mapped on schools.

Hi, are you saying that the library is not active? If so then we wouldn't really map it.

way/1459277814

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for adding this. Just letting you know that I fixed the phone number. We like to include the country code, so +1-253-752-3360 rather than +253-752-3360 which you had (that wouldn't work if you tried to call it directly like that).

Happy mapping!

Looks like you're well on the way to no invalid numbers in Canada!

Here:
node/11663930068

It looks to me like "+1-450-978-6888\;5889" was am attempt to denote an extension of 5889, but you removed that bit. There's no website I can see to check against though.

Hi, thanks for pointing that out, I forgot to move that to addr:suburb, now done in changeset/175709051

No worries, it was probably a mistake of mine to remove then

Thank you for pointing out the issue with Oasis Academy Winteringham, which I have now fixed, I must have missed that before.

Main feature tags should always go on the outer way, never on both the building/s and the outer way. Having an outer way is better than having just a building.

UPRNs are a bit tricky since we don't have many sources for what they relate to. I removed the UPRN there since the schools data shows that as the UPRN for the school, and I didn't think it should exist on two objects. I am not certain whether a school grounds and a building will have separate UPRNs.

changeset/175657787

Hi, I guess you are talking about the building here way/551933154 ?
I removed information from that which was duplicated on the outer way: way/1238980439

I'm not sure what errors you are talking about, but it is appropriate to only have one OSM element per feature, not two as it was.

Hi, I hope you're getting on well with my phone tool.

I see that you are making lots of single edit changesets. It's very possible to make multiple edits in one go (just keep clicking the fix button and then save when you're done).

I feel like that is more efficient, but you can do whatever you want to.