what did you use to check if the addresses you delted no longer exist because acording to oficial Miami Dade County sources

the ALPR added in this changeset is inside of a parking space when looking at it with the aerial imagery (I have checked with multiple aerial imagery in iD), please double check its position and fix it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

again, please be more careful next time, these service roads no longer exist.

happy mapping,
Udar.

please stop doing this, there are literal highway=construction ways under the service roads you added within a construction area, there is active construction in the area, this is something that I can attest to as I drive by often. Please be more careful next time you add service roads.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

the service roads you added at Southland Mall do not exist any longer due to construction in the area.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

next time please add a better changeset comment, for this changeset a comment of "added an electronics repair shop" would be sufficient, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

quick question, can you please look again and see if as part of this construction sidewalks have been added along Northwest 107th Avenue on the side of the street of this construction site based on the imagery you used for this changeset?

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

due to this changeset the geometry of the buildings is now broken, why have you done this?

Happy mapping,
Udar.

please respond to the above

This is incorrect, this section is under heavy construction for the go-ggi project (https://go-ggi.com/) from the FDOT, this project is doing massive amounts of construction around this highway interchange. The Bing aerial imagery is from January of 2024, the project had barely started at that point, there is newer imagery from 2025 that shows these roads as not existing any longer, they where mapped in the way they were for a reason. The new 2025 imagery can be used in iD as "Custom" imagery using the following URL template:

https://imageserverintra.miamidade.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Woolpert2025/ImageServer/exportImage?f=image&bbox={bbox}&bboxSR={wkid}&imageSR={wkid}&size={width},{height}+

please double check before doing something like this next time, things like this missing usually have a reason for being that way that is documented in the history of the object and the changeset comments of the changesets that made the changes, for example the changeset where I deleted the sections that now do not exist due to the construction and updated these ways as being under consturction since they do not form a valid network is 172670355 where I clearly put in the changeset comment that the changeset is done based on newer imagery to update what I could of the area due to construction in the area. The relevent part of the changeset comment is "various alignment and tagging fixes based on newer imagery at the GGI".

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

added tagging for rrfb and split median of road

this is incorrect, first of all bike lanes should always be tagged and not mapped as separate geometry. second the cycleway was aligned correctly before, there is a cycleway that is separate and one that is a lane, this happens in a few spots in Miami Dade County.

Happy mapping,
Udar

y'all should be extra careful with this stretch of Okeechobee Road (US 27) and its frontage road as there is allot of construction happening and according to FDOT by the end most of the frontage road from HEFT to Fl 826 will have a sidewalk on one side, so while I'm pretty sure that the edits in this changeset are in segment four which will not start construction any time soon and thus are correct its kind of hard to tell as all of the aerial imagery in the area are out of date (including the Miami Dade County one) along this road where construction has been happening. to double check you can use the following custom imagery in the web based editors like Rapid:

https://imageserverintra.miamidade.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Woolpert2025/ImageServer/exportImage?f=image&bbox={bbox}&bboxSR={wkid}&imageSR={wkid}&size={width},{height}+

you can get this working in JOSM, I have but that was a little more complicated, for more info see:

https://imageserverintra.miamidade.gov/arcgis/rest/services/Woolpert2025/ImageServer

the link for the main FDOT website for the Okeechobee construction project is https://www.fdotmiamidade.com/okeechobee . If you have any questions about this please feel free to message me here or through OSM.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

I brought this up on the OSMUS slack and did this partially based on conversations that happened there, the link to the archive is https://osmus.slack.com/archives/CCJ2P6KCH/p1767737543248779

As mentioned above unless there is a good explanation as to why only these addresses are in Hialeah while all of the surrounding addresses are Miami Lakes and the Miami Dade Open data hub has these as being in Miami Lakes this is incorrect and thus needs to be reverted

changeset/176961139

I made that change, if you want to see what it looks like you can look at it at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=176927813

if you have any feedback feel free to respond ask here.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

sorry I linked the wrong node, my bad, 13433783517

I could be wrong here and if I am please ignore, but node node/13433783518 is visually inside of the area of a road and seemingly not under a bridge, so I was wondering of the position is correct?

Happy mapping,
Udar.

please respond

The geojson file with the area that the existing project is within is https://github.com/Udarthegreat/public-sources/blob/main/tasking%20manager/pedestrian%20feature%20addition%201/area%20for%20sidewalks.geojson

Please tell me if you need anything else.

Happy mapping,
Udar.