Please do not do any other tasks within this area for this OSMUS tasking manager project as it conflicts with the area of an existing project on OSMUS that is public, https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/876

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

This edit seems to be incoorect, first of all, you changed the addr:city of several buildings from Miami Lakes to Hialeah, looking at the surrounding addresses they all seem to be Miami Lake and there is also the fact that these addresses are not inside of Hialeah but are instead inside of Miami Lakes so I doubt that these changes are correct. for more info see relation/118853 and relation/1217204 .
There is another issue though, even if the change to Hialeah was correct you still put it in in all caps which is discouraged in OSM.

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

then the stops should be tagged as was:highway=bus_stop , If you want I can do that

Happy Mapping,
Udar.

Road way areas can be seen from aerial imagery. For vehicle transportation ways it doesn't matter as vehicles are large enough for it not to matter, for pedestrians on the other hand having to walk onto the road and exactly where that happens is extremely important and as such footways should never touch road way centerlines unless they are a crossing or a link. The whole point of a link is to connect a footway from where it ends to the road centerline so this is a correct usage. Once the road area starts the footway ends and thus the plain footway must also end, but since this needs to be navigable a footway=link must be added to ensure the nav graph is complete. Two different types of road are still road (the same type of transit), so the ways can intersect in ways that different modes of transit cannot, footways and vehicle ways are different modes of transit, they thus should be treated as different modes of transit.
While certain ways are zero width footways and vehicle transport ways definitionally are not as if they where zero width they wouldn't be able to be used for transportation, even if a width is not specified. Transportation ways are an approximation of the 2D area they represent which is an approximation of the 3D volume that OSM cannot directly represent, so considering the area of various transport ways matters as the ways are an approximations of those areas. by splitting a router can tell you roughly when you are entering the road, this is useful to know.
I have also read the wiki multiple times over, I do allot of pedestrian mapping in Miami Dade county so I am very aware of the relevant wiki pages, the links exist and thus they would get tagged as either a footway=link or an unmarked crossing, which do you prefer.

Happy Mapping,
Udar

Road way areas can be seen from aerial imagery. For vehicle transportation ways it doesn't matter as vehicles are large enough for it not to matter, for pedestrians on the other hand having to walk onto the road and exactly where that happens is extremely important and as such footways should never touch road way centerlines unless they are a crossing or a link. The whole point of a link is to connect a footway from where it ends to the road centerline so this is a correct usage. Once the road area starts the footway ends and thus the plain footway must also end, but since this needs to be navigable a footway=link must be added to ensure the nav graph is complete. Two different types of road are still road (the same type of transit), so the ways can intersect in ways that different modes of transit cannot, footways and vehicle ways are different modes of transit, they thus should be treated as different modes of transit.
While certain ways are zero width footways and vehicle transport ways definitionally are not as if they where zero width they wouldn't be able to be used for transportation, even if a width is not specified. Transportation ways are an approximation of the 2D area they represent which is an approximation of the 3D volume that OSM cannot directly represent, so considering the area of various transport ways matters as the ways are an approximations of those areas. by splitting a router can tell you roughly when you are entering the road, this is useful to know.
I have also read the wiki multiple times over, I do allot of pedestrian mapping in Miami Dade county so I am very aware of the relevant wiki pages, the links exist and thus they would get tagged as either a footway=link or an unmarked crossing, which do you prefer.

Happy Mapping,
Udar

can you please check if it has a ref again, all of the MDT bus stop signs I have seen have a ref number and QR code. I have attached an example image below showing what they look like below
https://api.panoramax.xyz/?focus=pic&map=20.63/25.6798389/-80.3681972&pic=11dc3e52-81cc-45c8-a4d5-a2fa58139236&speed=250&xyz=355.69/10.26/7

happy mapping,
Udar

this is incorrect as definitionally footways do not exist within the area of a road as a road is a different mode of transportation then footways and thus the only footway that should exist within a road area is a crossing or a link, these are clearly not crossings and thus they are links, please do not remove them.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

all of the other addresses in the area have a postcode of 33122, what this used to be, what is your source for this change.

question, can you please check this again as there seem to be multiple commercial and retail businesses along this street so there is a good chance that hgv vehicles would be allowed on it.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

this also seems to add a duplicate address.

what is "Darris hall", what type of amenity, shop etc is it?

entrance=* should not be on the vertex of a road intersection, they are intended to represent the entrance of a building or similar structure.

happy mapping,
Udar.

if your going to add address data please add the house number and street name on the address

happy mapping,
Udar.

when you add address data please add the correct road name as that can be hard to interpolate to the correct value at times.

happy mapping,
Udar.

next time please don't just add a name without a tag specifying what the object is, aka what type of business is this. I have put a changeset in adding something but I am uncertain of that.

Happy mapping,
Udar.

A few comments about this changeset:
- Next time please leave a changeset comment that better describes what you did in the changeset, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
- this changeset also adds duplicate information as facebook=*, instagram=*, linkedin=* are already tagged through contact:facebook=* etc

Happy mapping,
Udar.

two questions, first why did you remove the building:levels=49 tag as it seems to be correct for the building. Second, it this the only business in the building as it seems like there could be others.

Happy mapping,
Udar

the arcgis link provided has the following error that does not allow others to see the data and check correctness:
"
Unable to add layer GeneralGovernment PA
The layer, GeneralGovernment PA, cannot be added to the map."

why did you remove the way that used to represent the building, the building tag should have been added back instead of being removed.

why did you remove building=yes as this does seem to be a building, you also remove the height tag which if not correct should have been fixed instead of being removed, that tag is there as this building was initially added as part of the 2016 Miami building import which added the height tag to buildings that were added as part of that import. I also agree that the contents of the description of this business is not very good. The opening hours are also not formatted correctly.

Happy mapping,
Udar.