Hi,
thanks for that, next time I will change the visibility together with reporting it to you.
V

Hi,
more than one of our user claimed, that this sections doesn't exist anymore and is not visible in terrain. I would be happy if someone from REI can check it in terrain.
And I'm sorry for not reporting it to you at first place.
V

Thank you a lot.

Hi, we got it in report from our user. It claimed that "There is a new path" and the drawing of the path was also attached. If you found it in Strava.com, it could mean that the drawing was innacurate. Unfortunately Strava doesn't support its WMS layer, which makes it harder to check. If you can, please fix it accordingly to Strava. Otherwise, I will look at it and I will try to fix it.
V

I can remove them on my own, or you can do it if you want

The first mentioned way is marked as razed (no remain). I know there is an disscusion on using it, but I have no strong opinion on it.
For the second way, the buildings are clearly aligned along the way, but it can be caused by something else than the railway.
So if you thing the ways can’t be there, I have no problem with removing them.

Hi, I found it there https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%A6rum_Line#
and also checked the visible ‘line’ in terrain.

Hi,
we got this as a report from our user. I deleted it now, but I'm curious why the users keep reporting this place as 'Punta Cane e Gatto' as this wasn't the first report about it. If you got any suggestions (I think you are local) why this happenes, please let me know.
Kind regards.
V

Supr, díky moc.

Jinak druhého pilíře jsem si nevšiml. Pokud se shodneme, že tam tagy být nemají, tak dává smysl je odstranit i z druhého.

Ahoj,
tagy jsem smazal, neboť byly podle mě chybně. layer=1 by znamenalo, že je pilíř na stejné úrovni jako mostovka (ale ve skutečnosti je pod ní). underwater by zase znamenalo, že je objekt pod vodou (kompletně), což se využívá třeba u podvodních kabelů nebo potrubí.
Samozřejmě nemám patent na pravdu a je možné, že existují argumenty, proč tam tyto tagy mít.

Hi,
I just improved the geometry of roads from current Bing Aerial Imagery (I can see I didn't put Bing to sources of this changeset, sry). I fixed a lot of ways by redrawing it (delete all nodes of the way except first 2, then draw the rest of the line from scratch), so it could result in many deletions.
BR

Hi,
I didn't find on the wiki, that the area=yes is needed for the place=square. But I added it, because it is easier than finding if it is needed and why.

Hi, thanks for the info. What will happen, will it make another node in next import? If yes, I think that the import tool should check if the address node exists.
Or please explain the reason in more details. Thanks
V

Hi, you probably did some mistakes. For example here [way/44584245/history] you put the maxspeed value '40' also to the 'name' tag. I fixed those I managed to find.

Probíhala tam rekonstrukce asi 3 křižovatek (a již skončila, podle toho co jsem našel). Pozici přechodu jsem zkontroloval v projektové dokumentaci a odpovídá to tomuto místu.
V

Mapy.com nejsou vhodným zdrojem. Mohou obsahovat chyby (jako pravděpodobně zde) a především nemají kompatibilní licenci (a nesmí se tak používat jako zdroj dat pro OSM). Nejlepším zdrojem je vidět situaci ve skutečnosti (nebo na fotografii) nebo alespoň v nějakém oficiálním zdroji (ŘSD).

Dobrý den,
je tento úsek opravu označen jako I/35? Geoportál ŘSD jej označuje jako nájezd na dálnici (a tedy nikoliv silnici 1. třídy). Můžu vás případně poprosit o nějaký zdroj (fotka, cokoliv)?
Díky.

Thanks. I fixed it now.

Thanks for the details, I changed tagging, so only part between the tunnel and C. Verde is marked as closed.

I think that the main problem is that the IFCN doen't even think, that tourists may use non marked routes. So they often mark (on https://ifcn.madeira.gov.pt/pt/) the whole route as closed. But in reality, only part of it is closed/is the reason of the closure and the rest is accessible.

BR.