Thanks. Just confirming this is an emergency=access_point not an emergency=assembly_point, correct?

Thanks!

Hey @lebedits!

Please don't feel like we're trying to push you out; many experienced users simply have set up tools to notify us about a new user's first few edits in an area. Then we can review new users' changes and help out by providing any feedback. We know that OpenStreetMap can have quite a bit of a learning curve, and we want to ensure that data is high-quality.

Feel free to reach out anytime if you have questions!

Thanks. Just to confirm, is this camera manufactured by Flock Safety, or is is a generic license plate reader or conventional traffic camera? I'm asking because with all the media attention on Flock, some people aren't aware of the distinction between different types of traffic control devices and/or surveillance equipment, so they add details that aren't correct.

Thanks again for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Hey, I see that you deleted pier 48. However, there are still buildings and roads mapped on the pier, and I was not aware of this being removed. I've reverted your entire changeset; please acknowledge if this is really what you meant to do and we can work on getting the map accurate.

Please note that OpenStreetMap is a real, live database and test edits are not allowed.

Thanks and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

changeset/179418741

Yes @Wildsharky, this is a partial revert of that changeset. See revert:id=* tag on this changeset.

Thanks!

Okay. If it never should have been on the map then it's good to remove it. Thanks for the cleanup!

Well presumably Pierce county might not have the alternate name. If you believe Pierce county's records are correct about 116th Squadron being the primary name, I think you should add Barnes Boulevard back as alt_name=* unless you have more knowledge about that name being invalid (e.g. is it old_name=Barnes Boulevard instead of alt_name=Barnes Boulevard?)

Hey @Ampersand%20Fitness

As the robot detected, you seem to have accidentally dragged a part of Aurora Ave far away from where it's supposed to be. I fixed that for you. Please be careful, and in the future if you break something and can't figure out how to fix it, please reach out so other mappers can help resolve issues like this. Thanks!

Oh, where did image=* and scraper_microdata:date=* come from?

Thanks for updating these parks. I have two small notes:

First, phone numbers should be formatted with the country code, using all dashes. So like phone=+1-425-622-9406

Second, while you're at it, you might consider linking these to Wikidata to help data consumers grab more of the rich data available, That would probably be operator:wikidata=Q1507935 unless you wanted to be even fancier and create Wikidata items for each park or something like that.

Thanks again, happy mapping!

Awesome, thanks for confirming!

@Nathan%20Runyan is there a sign that says 15 mph here? If not, do you know if it was previously a 15-mph zone, i.e. why was it tagged as 15 mph? Please let me know!

I added this in changeset/179118819, could you look over those changes to endure they look correct? Thanks!

1. highway=service shouldn't be removed. It's what tells data consumers that "this line represents a road." highway=service is used in conjunction with service=driveway for a driveway. I added highway=service back.

2. Is there a sign that states the speed limit? I'm confirming this especially because you've indicated that this is a private road. If it's written on a sign then it's okay, but otherwise you'd probably be running into issues with osm.wiki/Verifiability

Thanks!

Thanks! Is this name written on a sign at the entrance?

If so, I'm not sure as to whether that is really intended to be the name of this roadway. Could the sign actually mean "this is the way to house number 18280" and "this road is private property / privately operated"?

cool, thanks for confirming!

100% agree. Just wanted to make sure there weren't data quality issues you were aware of.

Happy mapping!

Thanks. I added back some info you removed instead of reformatting. Was there a reason you removed e.g. phone=*?

Thanks. We can tag diet:vegan=*, so I've set this to diet:vegan=yes. But if this bakery offers exclusively (or nearly exclusively) vegan products, and no non-vegan foods, we could tag it more precisely as diet:vegan=only. Are you familiar with the options offered at this store?

Happy mapping!

Thanks. I left a message on changeset/162981658 asking about those.