pkoby's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 29999819 | Would this actually be a path? Usually footway is used for sidewalks (paved). Also, notice the path that this parallels. Maybe those should be a single way. |
|
| 27641926 | Fair point. Editing may have been a better term. While nothing was seriously broken (routing issues, for instance), there were a lot of topological inconsistencies, so I made some changes to that. I apologize for deleting and redrawing the museum. I did not think about the history of changesets that would be removed. I will consider that in future. |
|
| 27642065 | My apologies. I should have phrased the changeset comment differently. I also apologize for entering your mapping territory. I understand your comments, and I didn't think about the issues for routing it would create. I have reverted the deletion of the Pride Hill way. If there are other issues, let me know. |
|
| 26221310 | Wasn't there a big old discussion about half a year back about how the parade route SHOULD NOT be a separate way? It is not a separate path, and should not be mapped as one. DON'T TAG FOR THE RENDERER. The parade route should be if anything a route multi. |