Thank you for the update 👍

The description is already much more neutral. However, the detailed list of services (SEO, SEA, Social Ads, etc.) is still quite close to promotional / SEO-style content and does not really add useful information for the map and its users.

A simpler wording such as “Digital marketing agency” or “Digital marketing consultancy” would be more appropriate for OSM.

Best regards,
Pascal

Reverted by changeset/177636928

Should be checked by the local community. Thanks!

Best regards,
Pascal

Should be checked by the local community. Thanks!

Best regards,
Pascal

Hi shiverinthedark,

I am not sure the added tagging fully makes sense. Did you perhaps try to add this store: https://harder-supps.com/
?

Danke und viele Grüße
Pascal

Hi Gian,

Thank you for your reply and for explaining your edits. I have invited the initial contributor who mapped the waterways here:
changeset/164246111

Best regards,
Pascal

@SekeRob

Could you please take a look at the following changeset:
changeset/177512178

It appears to revert several mapped waterway streams from this changeset.

Thank you very much for checking.

Ciao,
Pascal

👍 Thank you.

Best regards,
Pascal

👍 Thank you.

Best regards,
Pascal

Hi, thanks for your reply and for explaining your edits.

Similar to another recent changeset, I noticed that a large number of landuse areas were removed that you yourself mapped only about 10 to 12 days ago. That made me take a closer look at the edits.

Based on your username, I wondered whether you might be mapping with a video game or fictional use case in mind. If so, and I may be mistaken, please note that in the OpenStreetMap project we map what exists on the ground and can be verified from reliable sources such as aerial imagery, surveys, or local knowledge, not what might exist in a game or simulation.

When comparing your recent edits with the available satellite imagery in this area, it seems there may still be room for improvement and alignment with what is actually visible on the ground.

This wiki page explains the principle in more detail and may be helpful:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

Hi, thanks for your reply and for explaining your edits.

Similar to another recent changeset, I noticed that a large number of landuse areas were removed that you yourself mapped only about 10 to 12 days ago. That made me take a closer look at the edits.

Based on your username, I wondered whether you might be mapping with a video game or fictional use case in mind. If so, and I may be mistaken, please note that in the OpenStreetMap project we map what exists on the ground and can be verified from reliable sources such as aerial imagery, surveys, or local knowledge, not what might exist in a game or simulation.

When comparing your recent edits with the available satellite imagery in this area, it seems there may still be room for improvement and alignment with what is actually visible on the ground.

This wiki page explains the principle in more detail and may be helpful:
osm.wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

Thank you.

I guess something went wrong here: way/295393272/history/2

Welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your newly added/mapped highways?

Thanks.

---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz.php?c=177431620

Welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your newly added/mapped highways?

Thanks.

---
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz.php?c=177420648

Wolltest du vlt. changeset/177253794 reverten?

Hi Nakaner,

ich denke hier hat etwas nicht ganz funktioniert. Die spammy Description ist noch da ...

Best,
Pascal

Thank you for updating the description. Looks good!

Best regards, Pascal

Should be fixed by changeset/177326870

Should be reviewed.