Hi Phil,

Apologies for not responding. We regularly always contact the community prior to any editing, but due to a small miscommunication this was not done on talk-gb. We are correcting this issue now and are also communicating with members of OSM Data Working Group to reformat and add any missing information on our editing.

When it comes to names, we’ve used Wikipedia information and various sources for additional checks. We’ve had some community comments and as of yesterday stopped adding any names at all.

Hope this answers your questions and thanks for your comments.

All best borovac

Hi,
Thanks for your feedback.

@trigpoint I wanted to add different language names and mistakenly corrected wikidata. I see how some of the names can feel redundant having the same form. I reverted my changes so that they don’t make a confusion and will try to be more descriptive in my comments in the future.

@Richard I agree that UK boundaries can seem complex. It was not my intention to disrupt it in any way, but just to enrich it with additional information. I will refrain from adding any information to boundaries in the UK for now. As you mentioned, local knowledge is very important, so I will happily align my mapping to guidelines of the community. If you have some additional pointers or have recommendations on where to get more information, please let me know.

Hi,
I accidentally added a city instead of a district. I have checked your allegations and corrected them by adding names for Worcestershire.
Thank you borovac

Hi EdLoach,
We will do update https://github.com/Microsoft/Open-Maps page. Thank you for drawing attention.
Best regards Borovac

Hi,
Thanks, It was accidentally added when I entered the tags.

Adding missing names #MSFTOpenMaps
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119744319

Hi ralley, thanks for the info, I have missed that completely. I will double check from now on.

Great, I'm glad we understood each other and solved this case.
All best borovac

Hi ashs_as

I removed the one because the validator on the JOSM shows that the roundabout is missing. Also, on Maxar Premium Imagery, we can see that this is a roundabout, not a circular road.
If you are sure that this way is circular I will back oneway=yes and removed junction=roundabout.

Regards borovac

Hi,
I am checked this name and I am fixed like you said. Thank you for letting me know.

Hi Alex
I came across this road "way/779218337" which is not tagged.
Could you please take a look at what this is about? Is it a ferry route or something else?
Thanks in advance Borovac

Hello,

I just now got a comment notice for my changeset.

I check now and I saw that you have to fix the broken relation.

Thank you.

Best regards borovac

For the imagery source I used: National Geographic Institute Mosaic
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116291888

Adding missing roads in Uruguay using MapWithAI detections #MSFTOpenMaps
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114251109

Adding missing roads in Uruguay using MapWithAI detections #MSFTOpenMaps

Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta); MapWithAI
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114210222

Hi ovruni,
Gracias por las correcciones que hizo y por la información adicional. En el trabajo futuro, usaré las pautas que nos dio.
all best borovac

Hi ovruni,
Gracias por las correcciones que hizo y por la información adicional. En el trabajo futuro, usaré las pautas que nos dio.
all best borovac

Hi ovruni,
Gracias por las correcciones que hizo y por la información adicional. En el trabajo futuro, usaré las pautas que nos dio.
all best borovac

Hi ovruni,
Gracias por las correcciones que hizo y por la información adicional. En el trabajo futuro, usaré las pautas que nos dio.
all best borovac

Hi ovruni,
Gracias por las correcciones que hizo y por la información adicional. En el trabajo futuro, usaré las pautas que nos dio.
all best borovac