For example way/406805796

Hi magma18, thanks for adding street names in Sunyani! When you add or change a street name on one side of a divided highway like on way/406805796, can you also add it to the the other side (way/406805798) to make the data more consistent?

Hi Diogenes, did you mean to add oneway=yes to way/655100073? Imagery shows cars driving both directions.

Hi, make sure not to name buildings -- the name is the official name of the thing, not a description. If you want to add something like "uncompleted building" I'd suggest you use the description or note field.

Hi, thanks for mapping. For rural roads it is better to use the track classification. Only the most important roads in the country should be classified as trunk: highway=*

It's been fixed but if you have any other questions let me know or ask whoever is running your mapping event. Thanks.

Thanks for mapping. When mapping land uses, please make sure to map the features as one continuous feature, not little squares of each type. The land use doesn't end at the end of the square. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.

Hi Sherman82, welcome to OSM. The buildings you added do not qualify as approved OSM features since they are temporary (please see good practices: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features). For additional information on how to get started, there is a great guide here: osm.wiki/Beginners'_guide

I have deleted these exposition booths.

Thanks

Hi there, it looks like you divided some roads in Singapore into separate ways for each direction, do you have a source for that? Gul Way was fixed here, but looking at imagery they look combined to me and the policy generally says they shouldn't be divided unless there is a physical barrier: osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks! Andrew

Thanks for mapping! In this case it looks like you dragged a node by mistake, see here how the road moved: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62163134/?filters=%7B%22date__gte%22:%5B%7B%22label%22:%22%22,%22value%22:%22%22%7D%5D,%22users%22:%5B%7B%22label%22:%22NURU%20ATHUMANI%22,%22value%22:%22NURU%20ATHUMANI%22%7D%5D,%22is_suspect%22:%5B%7B%22label%22:%22Yes%22,%22value%22:%22True%22%7D%5D%7D

Hi there, it looks like you were using Bing imagery and deleted a lot of roads that exist -- in this case ESRI and Digital Globe Standard imagery are both newer than Bing imagery. See in this area for example, here are new paved roads on ESRI imagery: osm.org/edit#map=17/15.54501/32.65244

way/624455846, way/624783564, way/624455849 are all other roads that exist. Let me know if you'd like me to fix it. Thanks.

Hi, it looks like you've mapped some things that don't exist. OpenStreetMap is only for real features, if you'd like to add pretend features please use another website. If you'd like to map real features, please check out osm.org/welcome

Hi, it looks like you've mapped some things that don't exist. OpenStreetMap is only for real features, if you'd like to add pretend features please use another website. If you'd like to map real features, please check out osm.org/welcome

I see your point, but I think in this case making all the side roads into tracks kind of eliminates the network element of things, it's harder to see which might be the main ways of travel. In my opinion those ways above and a few others are larger than the rest of the tracks. It also results in a lot of inconsistency, like here, where roads change classification and there are tiny chunks: osm.org/#map=15/-10.1590/33.4339

Let me know what you think. Thanks.

That disagrees with the Chile guidelines which says it need to be between major cities, neither of these are those, and refs are not mentioned there at all. That particular ref also continues farther but the entire route isn't tagged the same way. If I can also make a suggestion again to comment on changesets rather than reverting them, we can talk more about the issues and try to figure them out.

Hi, it looks like you are mapping the roads accurately but please don't add names unless you are there. I doubt these roads in Tanzania are named for you. People rely on this map to be accurate.

Please don't add fake things to the map. They will be removed.

Hola, por favor no nombra calles con latitud y longitud, no están los nombres correctos. Si necesita ayuda, por favor envíame un mensaje.

Hello, please don't name roads for a Latitude and Longitude, that is not the road's name. Let me know if you have any questions.

Buenas dias, por favor no nombra calles con latitud y longitud, no están los nombres correctos. Si necesita ayuda, por favor envíame un mensaje.

Hello, please don't name roads for a Latitude and Longitude, that is not the road's name. Let me know if you have any questions.

Buenas dias, por favor no nombra calles con latitud y longitud, no están los nombres correctos. Si necesita ayuda, por favor envíame un mensaje.

Hello, please don't name roads for a Latitude and Longitude, that is not the road's name. Let me know if you have any questions.

Hi again, can you explain the changes to this segment? Why secondary from trunk? way/639780017