Udarian's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 179110351 | what is your source for the Wendy's being closed? Happy mapping,
|
|
| 179008199 | forgot to add road name at the end there, the end of the changeset comment was intended to be "at i95 and SR 860 Miami Gardens Drive." |
|
| 178936997 | does this mean that the Ross is no longer there? Happy Mapping,
|
|
| 178922021 | After looking through some of these it seems like a decent amount of these are duplicates of some form of already mapped features. Can you please look back through this changeset and fix the duplicates. Happy Mapping,
|
|
| 178837887 | wrong changeset comment, the correct on would have been:
|
|
| 178735020 | why did you remove gnis:feature_id from way way/435731403 |
|
| 178731092 | why did you remove the gnis:feature_id ? Happy mapping,
|
|
| 178713757 | what does addr:country=Sunrise even mean???? Happy mapping,
|
|
| 178703742 | next time can you please leave a better changeset comment as the comment on this one doesn't really tell me anything about what you did in this changeset. A good changeset comments doesn't need to be to complex, something like "added description to business" would have been sufficient for this changeset. For more information on changeset comments see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Happy mapping,
|
|
| 178656743 | next time please leave a changeset comment describing what you did in the changeset, for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Happy mapping,
|
|
| 178615598 | next time when adding a business please add more then a name, for a POI to be useful it needs a tag like shop=* or amenity=* to describe what the object is. also when adding address data please add at least addr:street=* because that one is harder to correctly interpolate. Happy mapping,
|
|
| 178607504 | there was a small issue with this changeset, when you attached node node/544218590 to the new bridge area it shifted if significantly from the centerline and thus correct alignment for the motorway link ways it is a part of. This has been fixed. Please be more careful next time. Happy mapping,
|
|
| 178483112 | this changeset added names to two separate roads that do not seem to be connected and yet they both have the same name, can you please check which one is the Northwest 21st and which isn't and fix the one that isn't. Happy Mapping,
|
|
| 178483014 | the comment on this changeset does not properly describe what was done in this changeset, looking at it in OSMCha this seems to more of a renaming of a business rather then a driveway fix. next time please try and leave a better changeset comment. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Happy mapping,
|
|
| 178467425 | the way added in this changeset seems to be a duplicate (without any useful tags on it) and the relation seems have no tags and no roles, why did you do this, what was your intention with this changeset. Happy Mapping,
|
|
| 178405555 | this changeset does not have a comment, comments are important for various reasons. Next time please leave a changeset comment describing what you did. for more info see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Happy mapping,
|
|
| 178377969 | the ALPR added in this changeset is in the middle of the road so I doubt the accuracy of its position. Can you please check its position and fix it. Happy mapping,
|
|
| 178372075 | are you sure that this is hgv=no because this service road is part of a commercial area that has warehouses (where the service road leads directly to the warehouses) so I would expect that hgv vehicles could use the service road. Happy mapping,
|
|
| 178350756 | can you please double check whether or not the maxweight applies to the non bridge sections of road like way way/1368282776 Happy Mapping,
|
|
| 178366875 | also, looking at various aerial imagery I have doubts about the alignment of way way/1476223639 |