Would propose the SS16 relations is split into regional sections, Marche, Abruzzo, Emilia etc so as not to cause long rendering waits in editing and cause BBox every time some edits a single node on this 4200 member relation. After splitting combine into super route.

Hi Martinummo,

Looks at the chg sets i posted in the area you mapped to see details, parking, ways (bad practise to map ways along edges of areas, inter area gaps. parking access, layering (arcades same as building passage behove no layer is=n. and more.
The place to look is your stats page at HDYC (How did you contribute) at neis. https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Martinummo
There's links to various lists, most pronounced, you've got > 600 routing issues to your name at OSM Inspector https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/hdyc-osmi-issues?uid=6698832, Also the Osmose links give more problems, often false positives but you have to study them before dismissing, else correct. Level 1 is grave, there's level 2 and level 3 too. Level one/two surely needs attention. Don't tag steps with access=yes or anything (an ID quirk), delete those else you allow horses to climb them too and granny in her wheelchair gets routed there and dangerous goods.
Level 3 mentions a lot of parking issues. Either add a tag parking=streetside or map a way onto it, don't stop at the edge, map to where cars really drive and specify when true aisle or a service way.

Have fun 'fixing'.

Hi,

Thanks for mapping in Italy. You keep 'fixing' landuse and other things and leaving a trail of issues, particularly unconnected nodes.... in Silvi, in Roseto, yesterday Giulianova. Overlying nodes have to be grey (connected) in ID.

happy mapping.

PS, this tag needs fixing anyhow...

aadr:housenumber=1

Hi,

Buildings in Italy have absolutely no housenumber.... they go to the entrance be it a node on the building outline or on the gate to the property, where the number shield tag is. Can all be read in the Italian wiki v.v. addresses.

ciao

Ciao,

Perché un indirizzo di Città Sant'Angelo su un nodo POI di Pescara? Se questo è l'indirizzo di contatto devi usare i tag contact:housenumber, contact:street, contact:city, contact:postcode. Se fisicamente si trova ancora in Piazza Ettore Troilo, è necessario ripristinare l'indirizzo, ovviamente con l'ortografia corretta. In ogni caso, se si cerca Nominatim si viene inviati a Città Sant'Angelo.

Per favore, fatemi sapere

Buona mappatura

Hi,

Need a favor: In rare use of car (it poured) took the new junction exit and remember there was a big white sign with a black printed diagram of the roundabout with destinations/directions for each roundabout exit... cemetery, San Silvestro, Pescara Sud, Franvilla ecc. Cycled over today to the Strada Colle Pineta bridge in hopes of seeing it east bound. No luck. From the roundabout see nothing at all so suspect it is somewhere near/before the emergency parking bay, SW of the Strada Pineta bridge. If you happen to catch it with your dashcam I'd be much obliged if you could PM me a copy or link to some drop box image cloud.

Muchos.

Multiple italian comments on more edit sets doing same, hitting 100K nodes. Time to run the reverter.

FYI, sent a PM to adamos (not Armando) about the routing change here. This mapper does daily updating of Flixbus route found broken. 8 days on and still routing via the 'trombetta'

ciao

Found a simple name ref "Parco del Terzolle, and this seeming offical http://www.lavalle-equitazione.it/area-naturale-protetta-del-torrente-terzolle/ "AREA NATURALE ANPIL DEL TORRENTE TERZOLLE"

OK, duplicate way removed, inner's gone, converted to a simple polygon outline. As bonus mapped a few orchards and track.

BTW, it was not only a duplicate way, it was connected at every of the 1236 nodes to the one which was there before, both with same MP tags. Anyway, the name does/did not render at any zoom level but I've seen that before on protected areas/natural reserves. Wonder how official the very long name is.

Hi,

Why is this natural area in a type=multipolygon relation and not type=boundary? What is the relation of these 25 'inner' to the protected area? These residential and other areas with buildings like Ospidale Fraticini now show a protected area boundary inner, this set up not seen anywhere before. Think they all need to be removed from the protected area relation as the are not 'inner' to anything and in fact are flagged that their roles have to be outer, if at all. In fact now the boundary has been mapped twice, object 1160009968 and 1228938891. One has to go as now it's reported as a duplicated segment of 1236 nodes.

please let us know
ciao

Hi The 'saga'... saw one of the changes applied to sections of the SS16 to secondary following the close of the Trombetta. Me thinketh the roundabout from SS714 to SS16 and part De Lollis have to be Primary now, their practical role now.

have a nice day.

Hi

You 'typo' got flagged. It's Publio, not Publbio. If you change a street name, you need to change all sections including the Vico's too and the addresses referring to the street name. See wiki https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publio_Ovidio_Nasone

ciao

Hi,

Don't want to know why you changed this beach resort building to hotel... some hotels operate a beach spot, but it does not make the location a hotel. Changed it to retail... nobody sleeps there... does eat there, drinks there', sits in the sun.

ciao

And no one who's done the hot potato of the half dozen flixbus routes, still looping around the ol trombetta. I'd leave that to Armondo, whence he finds out.

BTW, there's 4 editors mapping in that SS16-SS714 roundabout zone last 3 days....

No need, except for Luciani I'd connect directly to the flare top to resolve the level change issue and simplify routing steps. How a bus driver coming off the attrezzato is going to make that turn to the right lord knows, probably a full loop and then a turn onto Carmelo and thru onto Luciani is advised but see no such sign as e.g. at Ortona station exit.

There's one yield/roundabout traffic sign that needs to go absent the direct connect

ciao

BTW, the cops actually blocked the Carmelo exit on Saturday thusly all could not be traced then.

Hi,

Do not follow why you changed the geometry of Luciano. I've cycled it a few times and the traces and the experience is it direct connects to the roundabout, not that change twisr unless they added that overnight on Sunday, while the police was monitoring traffic flow
on Saturday when the junction opened.

At any rate QA now flags this as inconsistent level connections.

Hi,

ID got it wrong on crossings... crossing=* is to say what the type is, traffic_signal, uncontrolled, unmarked etc. Someone even inserted a line "crossing=marked (used by iD preset) - with crosswalk, with or without traffic lights", but that does not legitimize it... anyone can edit the wikis.
The crossing:marking is not =yes, it's meant to say e.g. zebra. It's like the many barrier=yes, which is meaningless.... barrier=gate/block/fence tells what they are. The root wiki actually says "crossing:markings=* - to tag the existence and style of pedestrian crossing markings"... zebra, rainbow, there's a whole bunch of esoteric styles, allowing to also add the colours of the markings.
In short now we have a bunch more BeeEs tagging combos from the ID automaton.... crossing=marked + crossing:markings=yes, doesn't look good, neither adding another version to the object history for nop.
One of the many reasons I very rarely use ID to include it's poor poor handling of relations in any form, but that's a debate of it's own and endless.

ciao ciao