need more information as to why you think it needs to be routed along US 20 in the fixme?

deletion should not be the option here even if it was gone. Abandoned can be used even if there are signs track was there. If you are only arm chair mapping via imagery. the key is that is on track MOW equipment on this spur and really should be tagged as disused. I also see rail now that you have me looking at it a second time further down that spur.

even if rail is removed it can still be tagged as abandoned and should be. Even if you feel my take is in error railway=razed is appropriate as it lets other mappers know that the imagery they may find is not to be trusted. out right deletion is not helpful until all data sources agree that there is no rail or it is clear the right of way is obliterated by another project or building.

That is likely a ballast regulator on the spur.

ah. I added new imagery if you want to use it.

Washington park has bike allowed trails.

according to the wiki highway=cycleway
cycleway is still appropriate. this is also more important as this is part of USBRS 10

Agreed the stream may not be where it is supposed to be. you could use the USGS 3D layer to jog your memory if that is helpful.

Looks good, thank you for the edit

the edit does not conform to OSM standards nor would it show properly or as desired. it has been fixed by another user in this changset: changeset/179109258

thanks for fixing it.

looks good, you could also add the marked crossing to the node in the center or continue the path to the other side of the street even if there is no sidewalk yet to connect it with. Looks good. thanks for editing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179375640

"PNT" does not seam to be a real name. usually if a way has no name we just leave it blank. also the path intersects the water stream if it is a level crossing it can be tagged as a ford and listed as intermittent like the stream is.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179773753

looks like you deleted the lit=yes . did street lights get removed? also the check date rather than being removed can be left just update it to the date in which you last checked it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179811259

If you are using the ID editor you can square up the building by right clicking and squaring or using the "q" key. you could also set building=house for any houses. there are also building=garage and building=shed if you want to add them. thanks for editing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179827248

barriers have been present for several years. I removed the route relation so hopefully it looks less inviting

I had to add back the way you deleted.
changeset/179565589
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178748307

I added it back way/1486789303
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178193866

someone probably dragged it by mistake. instead of deleting it you can place a note and someone will come fix it. osm.wiki/Notes
you can also look at the changset history to see what changes have been made.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178193866

Hello,
you did not have to delete it you could have moved the end to the correct location. other wise it looks good. thanks for making the correction.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177658631

sidewalks can still have bike designated
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176811133

you can find the crossing data here:
https://www.fra.dot.gov/railcrossinglocator
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177006748