Kovoschiz's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 179640075 | Why delete the `=service` road? |
|
| 179640507 | Why deleting `highway=` and `building=` + `addr:housenumber=` ? |
|
| 179640618 | There's no need to move both `highway=` roads and `building=` |
|
| 179640815 | Very obvious mistake of mistakenly attaching vertex. Don't delete details, and changing to simplistic shapes. |
|
| 179640867 | Why deleting the details, and changing it to right-angled corners? |
|
| 179641001 | N-th deleting `building=` without even changing to `building:part=` |
|
| 179641184 | Why are you touching `tunnel=yes` + `layer=-1`, and what does this do? |
|
| 179641341 | 1. Roads passing through buildings common situation
|
|
| 179497024 | The suggestion is to distinguish by `maxspeed:type=` `=sign` vs `=HK` (`=HK:urban` etc are wrong), not removing `maxspeed=` |
|
| 179641641 | Why are you moving the `building=` , but then delete the `=service` road? |
|
| 179641708 | Why are you deleting a unique `addr:housenumber=` ? |
|
| 179641988 | 2. Buildings overhanging roads are common |
|
| 179642422 | Again deleting without even trying to change them to `building:part=` |
|
| 179654057 | ||
| 179642577 | Why are you deleting `building:part=` ? |
|
| 179642629 | There's nothing wrong here. Only not fully shared 1 vertex with `=park` |
|
| 179642692 | Please connect buildings attached together, not move them minusculely away. I have noted `apartments=terraced` |
|
| 179642895 | What are you trying to do here? Much deleting, and changed Hong Tin House shape by attaching vertex. |
|
| 179643060 | They are attached together in reality, and actually further overlaps vertically. There's nothing wrong with this in terms of standard OSM data layout either. |
|
| 179643621 | You don't even choose to change to `building:part=` for the `name=` (`building=` is used as they are recognized as different buildings, and each tower can have its `building:part=` which can't be grouped together in between ) |