*Please disregard previous comment, I accidentally fat-fingered the post button.*

CORRECTED:

NB, I've been mapping all way stops on the intersection node, per the wiki spec and how I've generally seen existing ones mapped, since the relevant wiki page highway=stop#All-way_stop says "All-way stops should be shown using highway=stop at the intersection node." I also tag them with stop=all per the wiki suggestion , as well as direction=both per one of my JOSM validators for explicitness (I have this tag trifecta as a macro, so I can apply all three with one keystroke).

You could instead tag the actual stop lines (i.e. the nodes currently tagged with highway=stop) with road_marking=stop_line (+ stroke=solid); per the wiki, "road_marking=stop_line indicates where the painted stop line is physically located, regardless of which node you tag as highway=stop, but only if there's a painted stop line." (which has been the case for all but a few of the all-way stops I've mapped so far in Blacksburg, versus perhaps half or fewer of the stop=minor s).

As that had not been added last time I checked the page, I had only been adding stop_line tagging so for minor-way stops, but just now I went back and added them for all the all-way stops I've added (except one or two that didn't actually have stop lines).

NB, I've been mapping all way stops on the intersection node, per the wiki and how I've generally seen existing ones mapped, since the relevant wiki page highway=stop#All-way_stop says "All-way stops should be shown using highway=stop at the intersection node." I also tag them with stop=all per the wiki recommendation, as well as direction=both per one of my JOSM validators for explicitness (I have this trifecta as a macro, so I can apply all three with one keystroke). You can tag the stop lines (i.e. the currently tagged nodes) with road_marking=stop_
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176805088

Additionally, there is a West Harwell _Road_ adjacent to this (and many places elsewhere); seems highly probable that "Drive" should have been changed to "Road" here.

Also (particularly so with significant name changes like this) it is important to include source(s) for your changeset, which this lacks.

SEO spam removed in changeset changeset/173246888
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173244652

Fixed the SEO spam added here in changeset/176507201
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173227470

Fixed SEO spam tags in changeset/176506631
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173092666

As you added back the blatant spam copy removed changeset/172577196 , I reverted that change and further refined the tagging in changeset/176506065 . Please be advised that continued SEO spam in this manner is not welcome on OSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172613073

NB, they reverted your de-spamification and added back the blatant marketing copy in changeset/172613073 which I reverted and further refined the tagging in changeset/176506065 They are currently 0-day banned, though IMO given their repeated pattern of paid spam activity and lack of good faith a perma-ban would be more appropriate instead.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/172577196

Sure, understood--correcting the immediate issue was the higher-priority change. I went ahead and changed it to `healthcare=occupational_therapist` in addition in changeset #176379470 . Thanks again!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176341614

Yup, saw that too yesterday after I reached out to them and flagged this the night before. Hopefully its an opportunity for reflection and making the most of the resources out there to learn and grow as a community contributor and a mapper.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176282025

Hey, thanks for the fix!

Although, shouldn't `healthcare=occupational_therapist` osm.wiki/Tag%3Ahealthcare%3Doccupational_therapist be used instead/as well, as it has nearly 20x the usage per taginfo (1853 versus 125), has a full wiki page and is documented on the main approved `key:healthcare` page, whereas healthcare:specialty just has a stub page and isn't included in the main key:healthcare:specialty page?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176341614

As multiple mappers and myself have each reached out to this contributor multiple times on multiple of their changesets over the past month (including four days ago regarding a number of breaking changes to East/West AJ) the great majority of which have had a destructive effect (intentional or not) on the existing valid map data while not making meaningful improvements, it seems the next step has to be contacting DWG.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176282025

As multiple mappers and myself have each reached out to this contributor multiple times on multiple of their changesets over the past month (including four days ago regarding a number of breaking changes to East/West AJ) the great majority of which have had a destructive effect (intentional or not) on the existing valid map data while not making meaningful improvements, it seems the next step has to be contacting DWG.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176281215

I reverted both these changesets as I can personally verify that the Pritchard courtyard and passage to it exists (having lived in the building my freshman year), and this new mapper has amassed a consistent history of edits inexplicably deleting or disrupting other buildings (including East/West AJ) in a similar fashion.

changeset/176289694

I reverted both these changesets as I can personally verify that the Pritchard courtyard and passage to it exists (having lived in the building my freshman year), and this new mapper has amassed a consistent history of edits inexplicably deleting or disrupting other buildings (including East/West AJ) in a similar fashion.

changeset/176289694

Once again, same issue as in most of your other recent changesets--the outer way tagged as a generic building in this changeset was already part of a (much more comprehensively tagged) building multipolygon.

Many editors (like JOSM) would immediately warn you about this mistake before you upload your changeset, but if iD doesn't, you can check yourself to see if a way is already part of a building multipolygon by scrolling down to "Relations" in the left hand "Edit feature" panel.

Happy mapping!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175808457

Changset reverted as like the others, it merely added a nested, conflicting and duplicative building=yes and name tag on the outer way when (much more detailed and precise) building tagging was already present on the encompassing multipolygon.

changeset/176170198

Same issue here--the outer way tagged as a generic building in this changeset was already part of a (much more comprehensively tagged) building multipolygon.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175766718

Changset reverted as like the others, it merely added a nested, conflicting and duplicative building=yes and name tag on the outer way when (much more detailed and precise) building tagging was already present on the encompassing multipolygon.

changeset/176170061

I certainly understand that this is a pretty complex situation for a new mapper to figure out. As such, it is a good idea to tread especially carefully around such unusually complicated mapping situations, and be wary of changing things until you fully understand why the original contributor mapped it the way they did and why it should be changed, given they are in all likelihood going to have much more experience than a newbie (and in this case, the contributor in question happens to be one of the most knowledgeable, experienced and widely respected mappers in the United States :). Thanks, and happy mapping.