These seem to include a lot of nonresidential uses like roadways. Did you mean to map landuse, or were you trying to create administrative boundaries for neighborhoods?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178321923

These might actually be administrative boudaries for districts and HOAs. Definitely looks like there's a lot of non-residential landuse mixed in (like streets, forest, etc).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178019300

Looks like you miscategorized The Salvation Army. That's not a charity, it's a church.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178019532

The Q key in the id (web based) editor can help you square up those right angles.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/178207141

Yup, that was a typo. Got it.

Right lane is permanently closed and coin chute has been removed. Both lanes have ETC transponders on the gantry, and formerly would also trigger the green signal on the coin lane if you had taken that lane inadvertently.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177897909

No problem!

Can you take another look at this? Seems like what got tagged as driveways here are far more likely to be walkways.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177816784

Generally a good idea to also include the street name on sidewalks; this aids (especially blind) pedestrians by giving street names in turn by turn walking directions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177699274

Got it updated.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177572844

Is it the first or the second building from the intersection on the south side?

OSM is not able to use Google as a source, but the buildings are visible on Esri Imagery, which we can use.

Is it the first or the second building from the intersection on the south side?

Is this in the right spot? Looks like it was added in the middle of the street.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177577929

Is this in the right spot? It appears to be on the lawn of a private home.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177572844

Could you doublecheck the location of this? It appears to have been added in the dead center of a paved intersection where putting a pole is highly unlikely.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177538601

I don't think Maxar is a valid source for edits after July 2023. osm.wiki/Maxar
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177490396

Aaah, OK, I get what you're saying now. In which case, it's probably best to just remove bicycle=* and foot=* in this case (since highway=cycleway implies bicycle=designated, foot=yes in this country).

Probably not! I'm curious which imagery you're using; most likely one or more imagery layers is slightly out of alignment and just lining up the imagery with the map and moving the camera to match fixes the problem.

Oh no worries! I might have missed that I wasn't looking at the most recent version of the object in question. Nobody's exactly going to be upset about good faith efforts like yours, I just don't have recent enough imagery to see the camera or I'd have lined it up myself!